A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between potential neighbours more than the development of the wall at a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has captivated countrywide consideration pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Occasions post about René Collier and also the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building is effective at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household home. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, exactly where progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized people. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being created by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their organizing permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries of their website, resulting in an encroachment with a Special Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, therefore regions are matter to strict controls under European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, specially inside a delicate coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their authorized group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular efforts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced within the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-significant h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering that come to be emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they were being meant to Get Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water during significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the website became One of the more putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions were cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter if interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute inside the authorized timeline.
In the core of the dispute is actually a disagreement about boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and circumstances connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got described their long-standing relationship to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few just seeking to develop a family members dwelling in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that each one works are actually performed according to Qualified information and accepted options. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including moving into the sea during Irish Times article about René Collier a storm, never alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description for any scenario a large number of observers see as increasingly typical. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Times report about René Collier pointed out the businessman experienced Formerly been involved with community advocacy on organizing and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from really distinctive Expert backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of waistline-higher h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Actual physical reality on the coastline as well as the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome continues to be uncertain. The courtroom must determine whether or not the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether any encroachment into a Unique Place of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and arranging situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to live along with one another very long after the authorized fees happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building is effective at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that deal with. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. What's more, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems including environmental safety and home legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre from the dispute stands partially constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it is going to in the end be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will count on the court’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely continue on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to one of the most closely viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.