A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal setting up disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary efforts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, Based on sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, an image that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment inside the legal timeline.
In the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his examination of preparing paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is inspired by worry for environmental safety and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting rather that it is about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've described their very long-standing link to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply just seeking to produce a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the René Collier and Paul Feely wall encroaches on a Exclusive Place of Conservation and say that each one works are actually performed depending on professional tips and approved strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying info.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about design of wall at coastal web-site is becoming a shorthand description for any scenario that many observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier pointed out that the businessman experienced previously been associated with area advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite different professional backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded through midsection-substantial drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the physical fact from the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an extreme tactic.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court have to decide if the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and scheduling problems. However the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who need to Are living alongside one another extensive following the legal expenditures happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction performs at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the case lengthen further than that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the significance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Furthermore, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles for example environmental protection and property rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of the dispute stands partially developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Irrespective of whether it can finally be altered, taken out, or finished as planned will depend on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.